How we wish to be cited:
Safe dosage of oral vitamin B12
Verdict confirms present documentation
Editorial background
The intense debate on correct indications and correct dosage of oral vitamin B12 therapy has stormed in The Rondel (Table 1) and in The Journal of the Swedish Medical Association (Läkartidningen 2005; 102:1160-62, 1459-60, 1509,51837-8) for a year. The legal decision on the marketing of TrioBe by Recip AB was made by verdict No 720/05 of the regulatory authority (1). The company was found guilty of marketing their preparation outside approved indications and documentation (1). Mats Nilsson (publisher15_eng.htm), statistician with a special interest in Swedish cobalamin communication, finalizes the discussion.
Table 1
Previous contributions to the debate.
History
Oral cyanocobalamin, 1 mg daily, was registered in Sweden Nov 25, 1964, brand Behepan (2, 3). The second brand (Betolvex) was registered 1983 in Denmark and Sweden. These brands represent the bulk of oral high-dose cobalamin in the world. For historical reasons, Behepan has dominated with approximately 80% of the market in the period 1964-2000 (4). By now, there are four brands of oral cyanocobalamin, 1 mg, on the Swedish market. The indication is prophylaxis and treatment of B12 deficiency. Remission dosage is 2 mg twice daily during the first month of therapy. The maintenance dosage is 1-2 mg daily.
Present verdict (1)
During the period 1998-2004, some operators on the B12 market have asserted that oral cyanocobalamin, 0.5 mg daily, is sufficient for treatment of B12 deficiency (Table 1). The legal aspects of this claim were elucidated by the verdict of the regulatory authority May 6, 2005 (1). Recip AB was found guilty of marketing TrioBe with non-approved indications, non-approved dosage, and non-documented and insidious teaching on under-treatment of B vitamin deficiency and its consequence (1).
The basic documentation of oral cyanocobalamin
As an independent "expert", I was asked to analyze the basic documentation (2, 3) on oral cyanocobalamin, 0.5 and 1 mg, half a year ago. The texts have to be interpreted with due regard to time and context. The Berlin group wrote two reports on mainly the same patients (2, 3). Tables and figures suggest that at least 5, at most 12 patients (n=64) had been switched from 0.5 mg cyanocobalamin daily to 1 mg daily, when Behepan was registered 1964. In case there is a more exact answer to the question, we - my co-workers and me - will try to find it.
Trends of the times
During the period 1950-1965, clinical researchers used oral B12 preparations lower than 1 mg daily; the trials led to frequent relapses of deficiency symptoms (2, 3). It is reasonable to assume that this experience produced the scepsis against oral cobalamin therapy still found wide over the wold. However, the Berlin trial gained in confidence among physicians and patients. The Swedish experience with oral cyanocobalamin, 1 mg daily, was approximately 1 million patient years in the period 1990-2000 (4). From about 1990, B vitamin combinations with lower content of cobalamin were tried for homocysteine lowering. The effect on morbidity and mortality is now challenged (Table 1, e). The latest turn of tide is cobalamin dosage, 1-2 mg daily (5-9). Thus, the play is back on square one.
Conclusion
Previous debate is summarized in Table 1. It is obvious that some participants are closer to truth than others. The verdict of the regulatory authority closes the case (1). It is reasonable to assume that the past debate of Sweden is the future debate of the world.
Mats Nilsson, Dr Med Sci, statistician
Department of Family Medicine
University of Northern Sweden
SE-901 85 Umeå, Sweden
E-mail: mats.nilsson@fammed.umu.se
References
Published June 20, 2005