How
we wish to be cited:
Björkegren K. The
future of homocysteine – paradigm shift in homocysteine research [editorial].
Rondel 2007; 27. URL: http://www.rondellen.net
The
future of homocysteine
Paradigm shift in homocysteine research
|
|
Editorial background |
The process of paradigm shift
The accepted concepts of a defined group are
called a “paradigm” (3), the frame of reference, which guides our
interpretations and anticipations. Many of the bricks in this building are
defective due to age or erroneous interpretations in past and present. In spite
of restrictions, limitations and frailties, the paradigm defends itself
aggressively. Contradictory bricks are rejected. However, at last the building
cracks due to own weight, own weaknesses, and external pressure.
The homocysteine model predicted that a measurable part of our vascular diseases is due to moderately elevated homocysteine levels, plasma values ranging between 15-30 micromol/L. The model was based on previous observations that patients with homocystinuria, an inborn error of metabolism with tHcy in plasma in the range 300-500 micromol/L, are prone to die in young years by vascular diseases. The model was also supported by the association between vascular disease and moderate elevations of homocysteine levels (see e.g. 4).
Four large randomised and controlled trials (RCTs) have hitherto failed to demonstrate any beneficial effect on vascular disease by homocysteine lowering with B vitamins (5-10). Such findings constitute a paradigm collapse or at least a paradigm crisis. Thus, it is time for reviewing past experience and suggesting fresh moves towards future.
The NORVIT study addressed patients with an acute myocardial infarction within seven days of randomisation (6); the results could not show any improvement by homocysteine lowering. However, it is noteworthy that pyridoxine (40 mg daily) did not lower homocysteine levels. The observation supports the conclusion of Brattström and co-workers that pyridoxine does not lower homocysteine levels in deficient and non-deficient probands without genetic disorders (11,12).
The HOPE-2 study addressed vascular risk patients in a broader sense (7). In contrast to VISP and NORVIT, the dosage of vitamin B12 in HOPE-2 was adequate for complete deficiency treatment, 1 mg daily (13,14). Nevertheless, the vitamin combination did not reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events in these patients (7). The editorial comments of Loscalzo on the NORVIT study and the HOPE-2 study are informative (10).
The VITRO study addressed patients with previous deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism (8). A combination of cobalamin, folate, and pyridoxine did not significantly reduce the rate of relapses. Thus, the findings of four prospective RCTs (5-8) demonstrated homocysteine lowering by B vitamins without measurable effects on morbidity and mortality. Nor does homocysteine lowering influence other factors associated with vascular disease (4).
Cognition and motility
The cells, tissues and organs of cognition and motility are affected by vascular
diseases. Nevertheless, homocysteine lowering has hitherto produced more
positive results than in gross vascular diseases (5-8). Demented persons with
tHcy above 20 micromol/L responded better to B12-folate treatment for two months
than demented persons with lower homocysteine levels (15). However, the study
does not meet the criteria of an RCT investigation.
The Lewerin dissertation (16) adds important pieces to the homocysteine puzzle. Essentially, the trial suggests that homocysteine lowering in non-deficient elderly does not influence the age-dependent deterioration of cognition and motility (2,17). Nor does B12-folate supplementation to non-deficient elderly improve cognition and motility (2,16,17). The Lewerin trial (16) meets the criteria of an RCT.
The FACIT study (18) reported that folic acid, 0.8 mg daily, significantly improved domains of cognitive function which tend to decline with age. The results are difficult to evaluate for an observer without special knowledge of the field. The absence of vitamin B12 in the trial provides a conservative bias (cf 12). The study meets the criteria of an RCT.
The Sato study (19) with hip fracture as hard endpoint provides the most convincing evidence hitherto in favour of motility improvement by homocysteine lowering; the rate of hip fractures was reduced from 43/1000 patient years to 10/1000 patient years (p<0.001) by vitamin B12 1.5 mg daily and folic acid 5 mg daily.
The mean homocysteine value at baseline was approximately 20 micromol/L in the Sato study (19). The study meets the criteria of an RCT. It should be emphasised that the beneficial effects of B12-folate in the Sato study might be interpreted as healing of nerve lesions in patients with mild deficiency, the healing resulting in better balance (20).
It is conceivable that moderate impairment of cognition and motility combined with tHcy in the range 15-30 micromol/L provide symptoms and signs of reversible B12-folate deficiency. At least, the findings in the Nilsson study (15) and in the Sato study (19) are compatible with this hypothesis. Thus, it is suggested that future studies on homocysteine lowering are focussed on such patients.
Take home messages from the past
One grim lesson from the past is never to draw conclusions about causes from
epidemiological studies. Everybody knows that the correlation between priest
salaries and whisky prices is complex. Thus, the joke of these days is that the
correlation between old age and homocysteine reflects a “reverse causality”.
The previous RCTs on homocysteine lowering were based on the observation that there is a graded dose-dependent association between homocysteine levels and vascular disease. Thus, patients with low homocysteine levels were also included. The mean homocysteine value at baseline was approximately 12 in HOPE-2 (7), 13 in NORVIT (6), 14 in VISP (5) and VITRO (8), 15 in FACIT (18). It is reasonable to suggest that the participants of future studies on homocysteine lowering should have homocysteine levels between 15-30 micromol/L at baseline (cf 15,19,20).
Besides the selection of conclusive patients, it is essential that future trials of homocysteine lowering are conducted with optimal doses of oral vitamin B12, folic acid and (possibly) pyridoxine. One such combination would be cyanocobalamin, 1 mg daily, folic acid 0.4 - 1 mg daily, pyridoxine 0 - 3 mg daily (cf 2,13,14,21,22).
References
Published May 23, 2007